| |
by Douglas E. Gordon, Hon. AIA, and Stephanie
Stubbs, Assoc. AIA
AIA Building Performance Knowledge Committee Chair David Bullen, AIA,
convened a symposium October 15 in Washington, D.C., to allow committee
members, other interested architects, and experts in different
building-industry professions to compare notes on the state-of-the-art of
building performance and where this field of study is headed. With the
able aid of Steven A. Parshall, FAIA, senior vice president and director
of HOK Advance Strategies (Houston location), who served as moderator and
facilitator, the group explored building-performance goals, metrics, and
promises for the future.
Setting the tone Parshall asked
the participants to each name one concept they hoped to take away from the
symposium. Commonly cited concepts include an understanding of:
- Metrics for measuring building performance
- How building performance affects human beings and how to bridge from
needs of people to how buildings work
- How to examine building performance from an occupant’s point of view
- Ways to get stakeholders, clients (including the federal
government), and other professions within the building industry to
contribute to the design part of the process
- Ideas to take back to practice and to academic courses that will
help architecture students understand the importance of building
performance
- The focus on the value of buildings over a longer period of time.
Bullen presented a brief history of the BPC knowledge community,
stating that this is the group’s 32nd conference. The knowledge community
in its current incarnation evolved from the Institute’s Codes and
Standards Committee. “Ultimately, the codes are about building
performance,” Bullen said, “and the purpose of this meeting is to provide
relevant information that we can share with the rest of the
profession.”
The five case studies that followed allow for a clear impression of
performance in the U.S. today. Following is a short synopsis of each.
Case Study #1: Four shades of green Some of Fox and
Fowle Architects’ most interesting work now is high-rise residential
buildings in New York City, according to Senior Principal Dan Kaplan, AIA.
This building type is very demanding from a commercial point of view;
clients consider them a success based on how well they “rent up.” Most
marketplaces have devolved into using products that are low first-cost,
such as exposed slab edges, low floor-to-ceiling heights, and poor-quality
masonry. “We have leapt into the belly of the beast—trying to advance the
quality of residential in New York,” Kaplan said. “We are doing four
high-rise rentals on the West Side—each has different aspirations of
sustainability from the clients’ point of view.” The first three projects
are in design and construction; the last is a response to an RFP that was
not selected.
LEED™-certification: Clinton Green,
built over Amtrak rails, is a brownfield project that offers 634 units
within 400,000 square feet and is the “basic package” for getting LEED
certification, and no more. Stepping allows for more views and light, and
the project offers slightly better performing HVAC systems, and,
interestingly, turbine-generated energy produced on-site. Doing the right thing: St. Francis of
Assisi, offers 583,000 square feet in 460 units. It earned a LEED Silver
by using all the features of Clinton Green, plus a curtain wall of
high-performing glass and green roofs. Its performance was not mandated,
Kaplan explained. The developer (whose namesake is the patron saint of
ecology) is trying to do the right thing.
Importance of water: The Helena,
on West 57th Street, has 600 units in 600,000 square feet and “kicks it up
a notch” by adding an onsite black-water treatment plant, perimeter HVAC
with no through-wall units, and a photovoltaic array, all of which earns
the project a LEED Gold rating. A
stringent sustainability code: The fourth design Kaplan showed was
for Battery Park City, which has its own very stringent sustainability
code. It offers 333 units in 600,000 square feet, for a LEED Gold rating.
An innovative wall section allowed the architects to introduce outside air
into the bedrooms and living spaces to allow for a more thorough wash with
outside air, something not very well covered in either LEED or the New
York City codes. LEED is not perfect, but
. . . You don’t have to love it, but it’s a useful tool, Kaplan
concluded. For New York City, LEED scoring for the site is the
“low-hanging fruit,” when you compare center-city sites against suburban
sprawl and commuting energy cost. Other popular techniques are improving
water efficiency and green roofs, which are taking off despite the high
costs because “people understand them and see the benefits.” Poor energy
performances still are rampant because of not enough money going into the
outside walls and haphazard indoor air standards.
Case Study #2 Building as Power Plant (BAPP): A fuel-cell-based
energy supply system for a multipurpose building Volker
Hartkopf, PhD, professor of architecture, Carnegie Mellon University,
presented the school of architecture’s prototype for a multipurpose
commercial structure that expands on the concepts developed from the
program’s Intelligent Workplace. Carnegie Mellon University is in the
process of designing “BAPP,” the Building as Power Plant on the CMU
campus. BAPP is designed as a six-story, 64,000-square-foot building
housing classrooms, studios, laboratories, and administrative offices for
the College of Fine Arts. The project anticipates meeting all of the
building’s energy needs for heating, cooling, power, ventilating, and
lighting on-site by using a decentralized combined heating and power
plant.
The BAPP will draw electricity from photovoltaics, fuel cells, steam
turbine, and HRSG and will be carefully monitored for electrical energy
consumption as well as for the heat these systems produce. Additional
metrics will include:
- Individual comfort and productivity
- Organizational flexibility
- Technological adaptability
- Energy and environmental effectiveness.
Its researchers and designers currently are examining the detailed
energy phase of its systems and their integration. Some of the systems
BAPP will use are:
- A modular floor plan, with
conceptual grids and nodes in modules that allow highly individualized
zones of comfort
- Johnson Controls environmental
modules and “plug-and-play”
power systems, coupled with an interstitial plan that allows the
user to get exactly the systems he or she needs
- A highly flexible façade system,
a gift from a German company, built of completely recyclable aluminum
- Flexible furniture systems,
structural piles that incorporate ground-source heat exchangers
- Water pipes for cooling.
The BAPP and its predecessor, the Intelligent Workplace, are
particularly valuable in fulfilling an overarching role for universities:
To show students what the future can be, Hartkopf concluded. He also
suggested that the group needed to become advocates for change within
government policies toward energy use and consumption, while we still have
the resources left to effect change.
Case Study #3 Aronoff Center for Design and Art—University of
Cincinnati Wolfgang Preiser, PhD, Assoc. AIA, professor of
architecture and interior design at the University of Cincinnati, has a
specialty that he has been perfecting for the last three decades:
Post-Occupancy Evaluation (POE) of human factors. The self-described
“building pathologist” of what people perceive and do in buildings
believes it is extremely important to describe what happens when the
building is built compared to what was intended, using both physical
measurements and observations.
Preiser’s first survey of Peter Eisenman’s Aronoff Center for Design in
Art on the University of Cincinnati campus began shortly after the
building opened in 1996. His group studied the building’s health, safety,
and security; function, efficiency, and work flow; and psychological,
social, and cultural performance aspects. Eisenman had said he wanted to
destabilize and confuse people in the buildings, and “the building itself
is very interesting as you move through it,” Preiser agreed. On the whole,
though, the building itself has not received high marks from the
investigators or many of the users rating the following criteria:
Wayfinding: Most people rate wayfinding to
and through the building as poor. The many crooked and skewed elements
make it difficult to orient, and the plan is not always kind to the users.
For instance, one must go out into the elements after parking in the
garage to enter the building from its most popular side.
Accessibility: The architect tied
the design school to the chemistry school with a huge, linking spine and
monumental outdoor stair that simply is not used. Outside and in, stairs
bar wheelchair users from access. “This is where the building really falls
down,” Preiser said. Another safety issue: The risers vary tremendously
from step to step.
Waterproofing: Steel-formed flying
buttresses and other elements of the east “signature” side of the
structure are clad with an exterior insulating foam system (EIFS). “Foam
Follows Function,” Preiser quipped. Not funny are the many leaks in the
building’s roofs and walls.
Natural light and views: “Views out
are damned. There almost are no windows,” Preiser said. But people love
the atrium, even though an eighth floor blocks a lot of the light, he
reported. The social hub works very well.
Circulation: Crits are held in the
wide corridors, which is a plus because it allows students to share work,
even though no tacking space was provided. The downside is that “noisy
groups have to walk by—and drive students in crits crazy,” Preiser
said.
Maintenance: Lights in the atrium
space must be changed by workers on cherry-pickers who have to remove
balcony railings to get at them. Preiser disparaged the cheap materials,
especially because the building came in with a $30 million overrun. After
one year, all the skylights had to be replaced, he said.
Preiser explained that the school’s POE data collection process
involves many different techniques that include:
- Interviews
- Survey
- Observations
- Photography
- Architectural research.
POE is now a required course for students at the University of
Cincinnati. In addition to POE, the group also frequently conducts
pre-occupancy evaluations, as they currently are doing for 42 county
libraries. Preiser can document the formal POE process back 30 years in
the literature. “If we can’t critique, we are in bad shape,” he
concluded.
Case Study #4 Building performance is dependent on
context High-performance design is a process of setting goals
and evaluating strategies that integrate all of the building’s systems in
the context of the location. Moreover, especially for large buildings,
commissioning is critical to long-term performance, said Adrian Tuluca,
AIA, of Steven Winter Associates. He based his discussion on four
buildings for which he was a consultant: Solaire, a residential high rise
in New York City; the nearby Tribeca Green residential high rise; One
Bryant Park, also in New York City; and the most recent addition to
Chicago’s McCormick Place Convention Center. The residential high-rise
buildings were designed for LEED Gold; the other two were designed for
Platinum and Silver ratings, respectively.
Among the systems incorporated in the four case-study buildings
are:
- Spectrally selective glass with
high-visibility transmittance
- Highly insulated and air-tight
walls, including connection details that minimize thermal
bridging (for instance, using structural plastic instead of metal for
curtain-wall connections)
- Rainwater collectors
- Fluorescent lights with
occupancy sensors
- Carbon dioxide monitoring to
modulate fresh air
- Photovoltaic arrays
- HVAC cogeneration systems
- Variable-speed drives on fans
and pumps
- Ice slurry storage to shave peak
energy use
- Black water purification systems
- Green roofs
- Recycled-content building
materials.
Cost is only one factor when considering green design, Tuluca advised.
In his experience, LEED certification increases the building cost by 5 to
25 percent, depending on what level of certification is to be achieved.
That is why performance measurement is so important as a means of
demonstrating that the additional initial cost is justified when compared
to life-cycle savings, he said.
Characteristics such as employee comfort and performance are elusive,
but even concentrating only on the more measurable elements, such as
energy savings, there are clear cost benefits, Tuluca said. Measuring the
performance of the case-study buildings showed energy savings of 20 to 30
percent, for instance. On the other hand, some systems have not proven as
effective as hoped. For instance, research shows that light shelves—often
used with the intention of bringing natural light deeper into a
building—can actually reduce the interior light levels, he said.
Building performance research is an area in which architects are
developing expertise in general as they catch up with engineers who have
traditionally been more actively involved in the science, Tuluca
concluded. Clients are becoming more environmentally savvy too, because
they see the market value, he said.
Case Study #5 A green building becomes a teaching
tool Kevin Burke, AIA, with William McDonough + Partners,
presented the Oberlin Environmental Studies Center as an example of what a
benefit it is to work with a client committed to measuring building
performance. The designers worked very closely with the students, faculty,
and administrators from the outset, he said. The results, which the school
posts on their Web site in real time, show that the building is
performing as planned. Burke said he visits the Web site regularly to see
how the building systems are performing. The center is a work in progress,
he said. Within a year or so, refinements will allow the building to meet
its goal of being a net energy producer, as it already is during the
summer months, he said.
One key to the building’s success is the student involvement in every
aspect of the building and its landscaping. The facility features:
- A large photovoltaic array
- A greenhouse-enclosed organic
wastewater treatment plant
- Orchards, gardens, and trees
that are landscaped with the intention of developing them into a forest
within a generation
- Rainwater collection to charge a
restored wetland area and for cistern gray-water storage
- Low-mow grass mixture in areas
that do have turf.
All systems are maintained by the students, who also did all the
plantings and tend the orchard and garden. Thus, the building is an
embodiment of the Environmental Studies Center’s curriculum and serves as
a teaching tool as well as an example for the rest of the college, Burke
said.
The stated goal from the very beginning was to optimize student,
faculty, and community participation in the design and subsequent use of
the building. Pedagogically, the landscape and building design were to
encourage mindfulness of materials and energy; promote ecological
competence; and instruct in the practical arts of materials use, building
management, waste cycling, gardening, and horticulture, Burke
explained.
Referring to McDonough’s metaphor of comparing a facility to a tree,
Burke posits that an environmentally responsible building should produce
oxygen, create habitat, store carbon, fix nitrogen, distill water, build
healthy soil, use the sun’s energy to make food, create cooling through
evaporation, change with the seasons, and self replicate. Thinking that
way at every scale from the building to the globe is incredibly difficult,
he said. One important thing to keep in mind at all times as well is the
continual evolution of the science. The firm looks forward 20 to 50 years
when synthesizing a design to consider the complete life-cycle building
performance, he said.
The Environmental Design Center team is a dream client, Burke said,
because they are serious and committed to the performance measurement,
which is critical to sustaining the building over time. Without that
commitment, experience shows, performance will slip over time rather than
improve.
Copyright 2004 The American Institute of
Architects. All rights reserved. Home Page ![]()

|
|
| |
| |
These five case studies will be developed further as proceedings
by long-time Building Performance Committee leader Marvin J. Cantor,
FAIA. Watch the AIA Building Performance Web site for availability.
![]()
The case studies also will form the basis of an upcoming issue of
AIAJ, the Institute’s
new journal of architecture.
Thanks to Shauna Kristel Shepston, HOK, who helped facilitate the
symposium.
Program
Overviews Three other presenters at the conference
informed the audience of their organizations’ building-performance
programs.
David Hattis, Building Tech, presented the ASTM E-6 Committee on
Performance of Buildings and its subcommittees. The committee’s
scope relates to promotion of knowledge, stimulation of research,
and development of standards.
Steven Bushby, National Institutes of Standards and Technology,
presented an example of research from the NIST Building & Fire
Research Laboratory’s work on building automation and control
systems, specifically, the “BACKNET” communications control system.
David A. Harris, FAIA, gave an overview of the
building-performance programs of the National Institute of Building
Sciences, which he directs, including the Whole Building Design Guide, which establishes
uniform criteria for federal-facility design. Use of the on-line
resource, part of the NIBS comprehensive Construction Criteria Base,
has doubled in the past six months, he said.

|
|
 |
 |
 | |